So I stopped using Ghostty...
ChaptersAI

So I stopped using Ghostty...

Theo - t3․gg
23:22
Mar 12, 2026
91.8K views
2.7K
Show description

I love Ghostty, but honestly I think it's time for something new... Thank you MilkStraw for sponsoring! Check them out at: https://soydev.link/milkstraw cmux github : https://github.com/manaflow-ai/cmux cmux site : https://www.cmux.dev/ twitter: https://x.com/manaflowai Want to sponsor a video? Learn more here: https://soydev.link/sponsor-me Check out my Twitch, Twitter, Discord more at https://t3.gg S/O @Ph4seon3 for the awesome edit 🙏

Have questions about this video?

Sign up to chat with AI and get deeper insights.

Sign up — 5 free credits
DeutschEspañolРусский
Terminal software transition
Parallel task management
Software development tools
Integration of terminal features
Future of development environments
TL;DR

Theo discusses transitioning from Ghosty to Semox for terminal usage, emphasizing its benefits and drawbacks.

8
Watch Score

Insightful for those interested in development workflows but niche topic may limit broader appeal.

2/10
Clickbait
positive
Sentiment
Should watch

Developers evaluating terminal software or interested in optimizing their workflow.

Can skip

Viewers not involved in software development or uninterested in terminal productivity tools.

Quality (8/10)

The video offers insightful content on niche terminal software with a clear presentation and enthusiastic delivery.

Clickbait (2/10)

Title reflects actual content focus on switching terminals.

Sponsorship Detected
Milkstraw — ~30s
Summary
Theo transitioned from Ghosty to Semox due to its unique features that align better with his workflow. Despite Ghosty's speed, customizability, and reliability, Theo found its limitations frustrating as his work grew more complex. Semox, which is built on the same core library as Ghosty, offers enhanced reconfigurability and parallel task management, making it more suitable for his current needs. Theo highlights some issues with Semox, such as browser integration, but appreciates its ability to solve specific terminal management problems. He envisions future development focused on an integrated app for diverse development tasks. While satisfied with Semox, he acknowledges that it might not be a permanent solution as technology evolves. Theo encourages exploration in developing new tools to meet the changing demands of software development.
Key Takeaways
  • Semox offers better task management than Ghosty, aligning with Theo's complex work style.
  • Despite its benefits, Semox has flaws like browser integration inefficiencies.
  • Theo envisions a versatile development app that can integrate numerous tasks seamlessly.
  • He expresses excitement for future innovations in terminal and software development tools.
  • The video's content is targeted towards developers interested in optimizing their workflows.
Prerequisites
  • Understanding of terminal usage and development environments.
Mentioned Resources
Ghosty(tool)

The terminal software Theo used before switching to Semox.

Semox(tool)

The current terminal tool Theo uses for better parallel task management.

T3 Code(tool)

Mentioned in context with Semox for organizing workflow.

Milkstraw(product)

AWS cost reduction service mentioned during sponsorship.

Manoflow(company)

Company behind Semox, in which Theo has invested.

Content Analysis
Type

vlog

Sentiment

positive

Difficulty

intermediate

Complexity

moderate

Target Audience

Developers interested in software tools and terminal management.

#terminal#software development#workflow optimization#Ghosty#Semox#Manoflow#vlogging#coding tools#AWS costs#productivity#developers#open source#tech innovation