Terence Tao: Why I Co-Founded SAIR
Show description
In this new episode of On the SAIR, Fields Medalist Terence Tao joins Peter for a conversation on what “AI for science” actually demands: not hype, but methods scientists can trust. Tao shares why he helped co-found SAIR as the AI for Science: Kickoff 2026 approaches: The tools are ready to reshape scientific work, but there are far more ways to use them poorly than well. Getting it right means researchers stay deeply involved, set standards, and build workflows that keep outputs accountable. The discussion also dives into why mathematics may be a best-case testing ground: When AI produces confident claims, math has the culture and tooling to check them, including formal verification systems that force each step into a precise, machine-checkable form. Together, Terence and Peter explore: 🔹 Why Tao co-founded SAIR and why academia has to lead, not follow 🔹 The reliability gap in modern AI, and why “plausible” is not enough 🔹 How proof assistants and verification can keep outputs honest in mathematics 🔹 Why breadth is powerful, but still needs human judgment 🔹 What real progress looks like: interactive workflows, not one-click answers 🔹 Why “AI” isn’t one thing, and why scientists use different tools than the public As Tao puts it: “We didn’t just want the answer. We actually wanted the process as well.” SAIR is launching its public journey through AI for Science: Kickoff 2026 at UCLA — a global gathering of leaders across academia, technology, and research exploring the next frontier of AI-driven science. Learn more: https://sair.foundation/ Follow SAIR: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sairfoundation/ X: https://x.com/SAIRfoundation
Have questions about this video?
Sign up to chat with AI and get deeper insights.
Sign up — 5 free creditsIn this interview, mathematician Terence Tao discusses the potential of AI in transforming scientific workflows through the newly founded SAIR initiative, emphasizing the importance of proper integration and verification of AI outputs.
Provides valuable insights from a leading expert in mathematics on evolving technologies.
Anyone interested in the intersection of AI and science, particularly mathematics.
Viewers not interested in academic discussions or AI technology.
In-depth analysis of AI's role in science, grounded in expert opinion.
- AI has the potential to transform science through better integration into workflows.
- Academic involvement is crucial for effective use of AI technologies.
- Mathematics uniquely benefits from AI due to formal verification processes.
- Current AI has reliability issues that must be addressed for broader scientific use.
- The future may see AI generating hypotheses and experimental designs in mathematics.
- Proper integration of AI requires understanding of its limitations and capabilities.
- AI's ability to assist must complement human creativity and intellect.
- Improved workflows integrating AI and human collaboration will take time to develop.
- Misconceptions persist about AI's role in science, often focusing on chatbots rather than practical applications.
- More precise specifications are necessary when assigning tasks to AI.
interview
positive
intermediate
moderate
Researchers, students, and professionals interested in AI and mathematics.