I left Antigravity. Here's what I use now (Claude Code vs Codex)
Chapters

I left Antigravity. Here's what I use now (Claude Code vs Codex)

Eric Michaud
14:11
Mar 18, 2026
12.4K views
394
Show description

📚Get the Vault Workflow HERE: https://www.skool.com/easymachineai/classroom/b49ec0c3 🤖 Let's Work Together: https://easymachineai.com/contact [email protected] Google Anti-gravity is officially a bloodbath. With everyone jumping ship over the rate limits, we need actual alternatives to get work done this week. In this video, I’m breaking down my rebound AI stack: comparing Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex as a business operator. I don't have a computer science degree—I used to run a moving company. So this isn't a benchmark test; it's about what actually runs my business day-to-day. We cover where Codex excels as a token-efficient workhorse, why Claude Code is the ultimate manager for complex workflows and automations, and exactly how I'm running both of them side-by-side inside the same Obsidian vault to build the universal remote that Anti-gravity should have been. Timestamps 00:00 Why Everyone is Leaving Google Anti-Gravity 01:40 OpenAI Codex & GPT-5.4 Breakdown 03:10 Codex Benchmarks: Spec-Driven Workflows & Efficiency 05:50 Claude Code Overview: The Best AI Agent for VS Code? 08:05 Claude Opus vs Codex: Automations & Webhooks 09:55 Don't Choose Just One: How to Run Both AI Agents 11:10 My Complete Obsidian Vault AI Workflow 13:35 Claude Code or Codex: The Final Verdict ================================ Why watch? I'm Eric — I run Easy Machine AI and built my AI automation business to consistent five figures monthly by learning to build my own tools instead of renting broken ones. This channel is about real workflows, live builds, and skipping the stuff that doesn't matter so you can ship faster. Stop getting held hostage by unpredictable rate limits and find the tools that actually let you keep building. 🛠️ Tools & Tech Stack Discussed Google Anti-gravity Claude Code Anthropic Opus & Sonnet OpenAI Codex Obsidian VS Code #ClaudeCode #OpenAICodex #AIAgents #DevTools #Obsidian

Have questions about this video?

Sign up to chat with AI and get deeper insights.

Sign up — 5 free credits
DeutschEspañolРусский
Codex
Claude Code
Google Anti-gravity
AI tools for business
token usage efficiency
TL;DR

Eric Michaud discusses his transition from Google Anti-gravity to using Codex and Claude Code for his business operations, highlighting their strengths and practical applications.

9
Watch Score

The video offers valuable insights for business operators looking to integrate AI tools.

2/10
Clickbait
positive
Sentiment
Should watch

Anyone interested in practical applications of AI tools in business will benefit.

Can skip

Those seeking technical, code-centric analysis can skip this video.

Quality (8/10)

The video provides practical insights and clear explanations of AI tool applications in business.

Clickbait (2/10)

The title and content align, providing a detailed explanation of the transition.

Summary
In this video, Eric Michaud shares his experience moving away from Google Anti-gravity towards using Codex and Claude Code as tools for daily business operations. He emphasizes that his discussion is not a technical comparison but a practical overview of how these tools fit into real-world workflows. Eric has a background in business, not computer science, and utilizes these AI tools to solve everyday business problems through trial and error. He provides detailed insight into Codex, noting its strengths when it comes to efficiency in token usage, task completion, and greenfield projects. Codex excels in spec-driven workflows and long autonomous sessions, making it suitable for budget-conscious teams. Eric mentions a promotion offering increased rate limits, which positions Codex as a contender for former Anti-gravity users. Regarding Claude Code, Eric highlights its advanced models and intuitive desktop app. Despite its strengths in token usage and rate limits, he acknowledges the potential expense tied to its agent teams and orchestrations. Claude stands out for multi-agent orchestration and custom automation, often requiring more token usage for thorough outputs. Eric's ultimate recommendation is to use both tools together, leveraging Codex as a workhorse for execution and Claude for strategic organization and management. This tandem use provides a balanced approach to maximize the strengths of each tool, supporting efficient and effective business operations.
Tools Comparison2
  1. 1Codex — Efficient in token usage, suitable for spec-driven workflows and task completion.
  2. 2Claude Code — Strong in multi-agent orchestration, offers intuitive desktop app, but potentially costly.
Key Takeaways
  • Eric moved from Google Anti-gravity to Codex and Claude Code.
  • Codex excels in token efficiency and task completion.
  • Claude Code is strong in multi-agent orchestration and strategic tasks.
  • Codex and Claude Code complement each other well.
  • Eric suggests using both tools for balanced operations.
Action Items
  • 1Consider using both Codex and Claude Code for balanced business operations.
Content Analysis
Type

vlog

Sentiment

positive

Difficulty

general

Complexity

moderate

Target Audience

Business professionals seeking effective AI tools for operations.

#codex#claude code#ai tools#business operations#token efficiency#ai transition#google anti-gravity#obsidian vault#vs code#gpt 5.4